Manna Isn’t Falling From The Sky

by Jose on July 20, 2010

Manna

Today was the 2nd day of the GE Foundation’s Developing Futures in Education 2010 Conference, an invite-only conference for the districts they fund throughout the country. This morning, we had the pleasure of hearing the many schemas for schools from David Jackson, partner in the Innovation Unit, an education futurist non-profit organization in London, UK. I learned a few things that are (for better or worse) irrefutable:

  1. Many of us are just not ready to think 3.0 when we’re still catching up to 2.0.
  2. Teachers specifically want something tangible when discussing anything about the immediate or abstract future.
  3. We have little faith that our colleagues as a whole will want to let go of their power structure within the system.
  4. Many of us are still waiting for the manna to drop from the sky, or the higher-ups.

By manna, I’m referring to the nutrition that came from the heavens when the Israelites needed some nourishment in their travels through the dessert. But for the purposes of this post, I’m also referring to the idea that someone from the higher-ups, whether it be collegiate think tanks, corporation-funded non-profits, or the Secretary of Education. Believe what you will, the system perpetuates the status quo, and the profit models for education currently support millions of dollars going into third party vendors to move what we call standards wherever those in power see fit.

Therefore, when looking at the models Mr. Jackson provided, I pondered for a bit about the work many teachers are doing across the country to truly move the work forward, and the way we need to think about student learning as a whole. Then, when time for feedback came, I stood up in front of the crowd and said, “Well, this is great, and we’re intrigued by the possibilities, but if we’re really going to do the work, it has to come from us. It has to come from the ground up, not the top down. The status quo is the status quo because of this model. Rarely does real change come from the higher ups; the change has to come from students, parents, teachers, and anyone who considers themselves allies to our cause.”

I got a light applause. Appreciated, yes, but the more I thought about the future, the more it made me wonder the sort of curve we’re going to have to slide down to get true change. I sat down, had a glass of water, and just hoped for the best. Educators are practitioners, yes, but we’re the ones we’ve been waiting for.

And if our hands are still cupped waiting outside, we better have a huge canteen as well.

Jose, who’s looking to reflect more on this as we go on this journey …

{ 0 comments }

Simon-the-robot1 Saturday’s New York Times brought us a fascinating article on robot technology and teaching. In their piece Benedict Carey and John Markoff describe the cutting-edge developments underway where “highly programmed machines” with motion tracking and speech recognition tools can engage humans and “rival” some teaching tasks. In one investigation, reported in the NYT article, a robot named “RUBI” was found to significantly improve the vocabulary of two handfuls of toddlers.

No doubt artificial intelligence can greatly enhance learning opportunities for the growing diversity of students entering our public schools. So many other industries and professions —whether in automobile manufacturing or in medicine —increasingly are investing in technology to enhance productivity and advance professional practice.

But as one executive of a company that makes a remotely controlled robot made perfectly clear: “The problem with autonomous machines is that people are so unpredictable, especially children” and “it’s impossible to anticipate everything that can happen” in a classroom. As Carey and Markoff note, “If robots are to be truly effective guides…they will have to do what any good teacher does: learn from students when a lesson is taking hold and when it is falling flat.”

If you do not quite get this point, just turn to another piece in the Saturday edition of the Times, pointing to the large growth in Teach for America — a high-profile effort to recruit recent young graduates of top-flight universities, who receive only a few weeks of basic training before they enter some of the nation’s highest needs schools. Here’s what reporter Michael Winerip writes about Lilianna Nguyen, a recent Stanford graduate, who is struggling to teach a sixth-grade math class about negative numbers.

(Liliana) prepared definitions to be copied down, but the projector was broken. She’d also created a fun math game, giving every student an index card with a number. They were supposed to silently line themselves up from lowest negative to highest positive, but one boy kept disrupting the class, blurting out, twirling his pen, complaining he wanted to play a fun game, not a math game. 



“Why is there talking?” Ms. Nguyen said. “There should be no talking.” 



“Do I have to play?” asked the boy. 



“Do you want to pass summer school?” Ms. Nguyen answered. 



The boy asked if it was O.K. to push people to get them in the right order. 



“This is your third warning,” Ms. Nguyen said. “Do not speak out in my class.”

This is where the nuance of knowing your students well as individuals and having a deep understanding of child development, sociological interactions in a classroom, and behavior management — as well as varied pedagogical techniques in math — makes the difference in what gets learned. And no robot can do it all. Nor can an ill-prepared and under-supported teacher.

We need Ms. Nguyen and thousands more like her, but we need them and those who support them to make a full commitment to the preparation, support and ongoing professional development it takes to become an excellent teacher.

{ 1 comment }

Blast from the Future

July 8, 2010

Katie Salen’s perspective on learning is so far ahead that she seems like she is speaking from the future. Her views are synched with the emerging realities that the TeacherSolutions 2030 team describe in our work. By the year 2030 teaching could become a student centered profession that gives students [...]

Read the full article →

Swimming in Reality

July 4, 2010

I recently joined a group of teacher leaders at a national symposium for teacher leadership. The Center for Teacher Leadership held the conference in my home city of Richmond, VA so I was excited to present but, I was even more excited to meet some amazing teacher leaders from around [...]

Read the full article →

From My Jerky Knee

June 4, 2010

This site–and the larger (book) endeavor it reflects–is about the future. It’s about change. It’s about a massive (re)imagining of how we do teaching and learning. It is, in large measure, about technology and the verbs we use in conjunction with technology: harness, maximize, tailor. I got involved in projects like this, or hear about [...]

Read the full article →

James Bond and The Difference Between Professionalism And Integrity

June 2, 2010

Yesterday, someone asked me what was one of the characteristics I look for in a leader, whether student leader, math coach, principal, district leader, president of the local lodge, the union, the country, or Pat Kiernan (anchor for New York 1, my local cable news network). I used the word “integral.” I think a few [...]

Read the full article →

Outside

April 3, 2010

It took me a week, but I finally returned a call to a woman who works at the ed policy advocacy organization for which I used to work. She asked my opinion about a school I’d visited. Then she asked about my school, its community, and what it takes for schools like mine (Black, Brown, [...]

Read the full article →

Putting Liberal back in liberal education

March 3, 2010

Heinlein once wrote, “A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program [...]

Read the full article →

A Future Context for Understanding Diversity in Education (The Tap on the Shoulder)

February 3, 2010

Let’s set a scene too many of us are familiar with.
A group of promising college students sit around a table, assigned to these groups by their college professor, for a group project of some nature. The first big assumption we’ll make is that somewhere along the way, some people will do their part, and some [...]

Read the full article →

Educational Insantity and National Standards

February 1, 2010

Jon Becker recently skewered several arguments about the direction education “needs” to go in. He did it so well, I couldn’t help but respond in a comment to another false assumption about the direction of schools.
On Educational Insanity Kevin commented,
I think the point Mr. Becker is trying to make is that we need to first [...]

Read the full article →